I heard a science fiction writer speak a few years ago, and
someone asked him about past dreams of the future. Sci-fi has predicted or inspired a lot of inventions
and developments over the years, the man in the audience said, but what was the
biggest failed prediction to come down the line? I’m sure he was thinking about flying cars or
robot butlers. I was thinking about the
hover skateboard from Back to the Future Part II.
The author didn’t even have to think about it. Without missing a beat, he said “That there
is a future for manned space travel.”
The air went out of the room as if every sci-fi geek
in attendance had just been punched in the gut.
I was only there as a volunteer to help with the event, not as a fan,
but even I was staggered by the writer’s flat pessimism.
After all, it’s not like spaceflight is a mere science fiction
accessory, like aliens or laser guns.
It’s the foundational idea of the genera. I can think of a handful of works by Bradbury
or Asimov that stay squarely on Earth, focusing on robots or time travel. But none that discount space travel
entirely. A sci-fi writer who doesn’t
believe in space travel is like a western writer who doesn’t believe in horses,
or a romance writer who doesn’t believe in heaving bosoms. Without that, what are you even writing?
Throughout the history of science fiction, the question
hasn’t been “will there be humans in spaceships,” but “what will the spaceships
be like?” Generally, they parallel some
form of technology we are already familiar with. In Star Wars, for example, most of the
spaceships are like airplanes, looping and rolling in aerobatic dogfights. Or in Star Trek, spaceships are ocean
vessels, pressing forward with a large crew to explore new territory, sinking each
other with torpedoes. Or in Firefly,
spaceships are stagecoaches, a way for outlaws and other desperate folk to make
their way across a dangerous, wild frontier.
We as human beings and tellers of stories are drawn to these
familiar dramas set among unfamiliar stars.
We take the technologies we have, and the science we understand, and
project ourselves into space, because that is the next place we are headed. And we have been doing it since before the
enlightenment.
The reason more people don’t know about The Man in the Moone
by Francis Godwin is beyond me. This
book, written in the 1620s, is one of the first real novels in the English
language, and (I would argue) the first true work of science fiction. It tells the story of an adventurer named Domingo
Gonsales who, shipwrecked on an unexplored island, discovers a new species of
bird. It’s a sort of large goose, and
Domingo finds out that it can carry unusually heavy objects. So naturally, he decides to create a machine,
tie a handful of geese to it, and leave his island in style. Domingo flies around in his goose-drawn
carriage for a while, having adventures, until (twist!) the geese decide it is
time for them to fly to the moon.
The fact that some scientists once believed that birds
regularly flew to the moon is the subject of a wholly different essay (in fact,
here is a good one on it). Suffice it to
say, in the 17th Century, naturalists were still trying to figure
out why certain species of birds disappeared for half a year at a time. Some suggested that birds hibernated, others
that they changed shapes. One
hypothesis, new to the scientific journals around the time The Man in the Moone
was written, was that some birds just fly to the moon when the weather on Earth gets too cold or they don’t have
enough food. It was a theory that was so, so very close to
figuring out how migration works, but was still deeply and exceptionally wrong.
The staying power of the science behind this book, however,
doesn’t really matter. The interesting
thing is this: since the very dawn of the scientific revolution, for as long as
human beings have had been discovering new things about the natural world and
transforming those discoveries into technology, we have dreamed of leaving this
world. Francis Godwin lived at a time
when the most advanced form of transportation he could imagine was “seat pulled
by animals,” but damned if he let that stop him from hitching his wagon to
something that could take him to the moon.
There are other, slightly older stories of humans visiting the moon by magic,
or in dreams. But The Man in the Moone
is different. Gonsales makes a discovery
(a new, stronger goose), uses that discovery to create an invention (the
goose-drawn carriage), and uses that invention to make more discoveries,
exploring the lunar surface and chatting it up with the native moon-men. I find that deeply beautiful, in ways that I
am not sure I can accurately describe.
And I think it’s a powerful refutation of the pessimistic
sci-fi writer I heard speak. The
problems inherent in manned spaceflight are deeply complex, that’s a fact. But for 400 years, we have been daydreaming
about ways to make it possible. Love of
adventure and exploration wasn’t a passing fad – I can’t imagine a future where
technology continues to progress but nobody wants to use it to visit Mars. We have always had our eyes on the
frontier. It’s just a matter of time
before we find a big enough goose to take us there.
The moon ain't the kind of place to raise your goslings ...
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76itSz-QEcE